Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Doses of Mirogabalin in Healthy Chinese Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Mirogabalin is a treatment option for patients with neuropathic pain; however, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) data specifically for Chinese individuals are limited to a single-dose study. We aimed to assess these for both single- and multiple-dose mirogabalin in healthy Chinese participants. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study, 54 healthy Chinese men and women aged 18-45 years were randomly allocated to receive single- (5, 10, or 15 mg, daily) or multiple-dose (5 mg titrated to 15 mg, twice-daily, over 22 days) oral mirogabalin or placebo. In each of three single-dose groups, 10 participants received mirogabalin and 2 received placebo; in the multiple-dose group, 14 participants received mirogabalin and 4 received placebo. The primary endpoints were PK, safety, and tolerability variables, including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory tests, and vital signs. PK data were collected for both single- and multiple-dose cohorts and evaluated by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Single- and multiple-dose mirogabalin was generally well tolerated with no deaths, serious TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Frequently reported TEAEs included dizziness, nystagmus, increased blood triglycerides, headache, and increased blood uric acid and creatine phosphokinase. Single-dose mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration, 1.00 h) and eliminated (mean terminal elimination half-life, 2.57-3.08 h). The exposure was approximately dose-proportional. In the multiple-dose cohort, the trough plasma concentration increased dose-proportionally, and exposure and clearance were comparable to that following a single 15-mg dose. The mean cumulative amount excreted into urine up to 48 h post-dose increased in a dose-proportional manner, the mean cumulative percentage excreted into urine was 61.9%-74.3%, and renal clearance remained relatively constant. CONCLUSION: Consistent with previous phase I studies in other populations, mirogabalin was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese participants at single and multiple doses of up to 15 mg twice-daily.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of DS-1040, in Combination with Thrombectomy, in Japanese Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: DS-1040 is a novel inhibitor of the activated form of thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor that may have therapeutic potential in thromboembolic diseases, such as acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or pulmonary embolism. We undertook a Phase I clinical trial to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of DS-1040 in Japanese patients who were eligible for thrombectomy following AIS. METHODS: The trial enrolled patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion, who were planned for thrombectomy within 8 h of symptom onset. Subjects were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of placebo or DS-1040 (0.6, 1.2, 2.4 or 4.8 mg) in a sequential-cohort design. The primary endpoints were the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial bleeding within 36 and 96 h, respectively, of treatment initiation. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: Nine patients received placebo and 32 patients received DS-1040. There were no cases of symptomatic ICH or major extracranial bleeding with either placebo or DS-1040 after 36 and 96 h. One patient, who received DS-1040 0.6 mg, experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage that was considered to be drug-related. Three patients died (2 placebo, 1 DS-1040), but no deaths were adjudicated as study drug-related. In vivo exposure to DS-1040 increased in proportion to dosage, but no clear dose-response relationship was seen for D-dimer levels and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activity. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of DS-1040 0.6-4.8 mg were well tolerated in Japanese patients with AIS undergoing thrombectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03198715; JapicCTI-163164.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of esaxerenone with amlodipine and digoxin in healthy Japanese subjects.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of coadministration of esaxerenone with amlodipine on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of each drug, and of esaxerenone on the PK of digoxin. METHODS: In three open-label, single-sequence, crossover studies, healthy Japanese males received single oral doses of esaxerenone 2.5 mg (Days 1, 15), with amlodipine 10 mg/day (Days 8-18) (Study 1, N = 24); single doses of amlodipine 2.5 mg (Days 1, 21), with esaxerenone 5 mg/day (Days 8-25) (Study 2; N = 20); or digoxin 0.25 mg/day (Days 1-15) with esaxerenone 5 mg/day (Days 11-15) (Study 3; N = 20). PK parameters and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Study 1: esaxerenone peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax were unaltered by amlodipine coadministration, but mean half-life was slightly prolonged from 18.5 to 20.9 h. Geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratios for Cmax, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to last measurable concentration and from zero to infinity for esaxerenone + amlodipine versus esaxerenone were 0.958, 1.154, and 1.173, respectively. Study 2: corresponding GLSM ratios for amlodipine + esaxerenone versus amlodipine were 1.099, 1.185, and 1.214. Study 3: esaxerenone did not markedly alter digoxin PK. GLSM ratios for Cmax, trough plasma concentration, and AUC during a dosing interval for digoxin versus esaxerenone + digoxin were 1.130, 1.088, and 1.072, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No drug-drug interactions are expected during combination therapy with esaxerenone and either amlodipine or digoxin, based on a lack of any clinically relevant PK changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Studies 1 and 2: JapicCTI-163379 (registered on 20 September 2016); Study 3: JapicCTI-163443 (registered on 24 November 2016).

Effects of itraconazole and rifampicin on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker esaxerenone in healthy Japanese subjects.

AIMS: To investigate the effects of the strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor itraconazole and the strong CYP3A inducer rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of single-dose esaxerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, in healthy Japanese subjects. METHODS: Two open-label, single-sequence, crossover studies were conducted in healthy Japanese males aged 20-45 years. In Study 1 (n = 20), subjects received a single oral 2.5 mg dose of esaxerenone (Days 1, 13), with itraconazole 200 mg twice daily (Day 8) and once daily (Days 9-16). In Study 2 (n = 12), subjects received a single oral 5 mg dose of esaxerenone (Days 1, 13), with rifampicin 600 mg once daily (Days 8-16). The plasma concentration of esaxerenone and esaxerenone metabolites were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis, and safety was assessed. RESULTS: Esaxerenone exposure increased when coadministered with itraconazole. Geometric least-square mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of peak plasma esaxerenone concentration (Cmax ), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero until the last measurable concentration (AUClast ) and AUC from zero until infinity (AUCinf ) were 1.13 (1.05, 1.20) ng mL-1 , 1.47 (1.40, 1.54) ng h mL-1 and 1.53 (1.45, 1.62) ng h mL-1 , respectively. Esaxerenone exposure decreased when coadministered with rifampicin. Geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of esaxerenone Cmax , AUClast and AUCinf were 0.659 (0.599, 0.724), 0.315 (0.300, 0.332) and 0.312 (0.297, 0.328), respectively. CONCLUSION: Itraconazole increased esaxerenone AUCinf by 53.1%, and rifampicin decreased esaxerenone AUCinf by 68.8%. These results suggest that caution is recommended when coadministering esaxerenone with strong inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single-Dose Esaxerenone in Japanese Subjects with Mild to Moderate Hepatic Impairment.

INTRODUCTION: The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blocker esaxerenone is a new treatment for hypertension in Japan and under development for treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Hepatic impairment is known to impact the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of other MR blocking drugs. The aim of the present study was to characterise the PKs and safety of a single oral dose of esaxerenone in Japanese subjects with mild-moderate hepatic impairment. METHODS: In this open-label, parallel-group study, subjects with mild (Child-Pugh grade A) or moderate (grade B) hepatic impairment, and healthy controls with normal hepatic function matched by age and BMI (all groups n = 6), received a single 2.5-mg oral dose of esaxerenone. Plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (up to the last quantifiable time, up to infinity) in subjects with mild hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function were 0.837 (0.637, 1.099) and 0.824 (0.622, 1.092), respectively. Corresponding values for moderate hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function were 1.078 (0.820, 1.415) and 1.098 (0.829, 1.454). GLSM ratios (90% CIs) for peak plasma concentration (Cmax) were 0.959 (0.778, 1.182) for mild hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function and 0.804 (0.653, 0.992) for moderate hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function. Time to Cmax and clearance values were comparable between groups. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 16.7% in the moderate hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function groups. One serious AE (hepatic encephalopathy) occurred in one subject with moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Mild to moderate hepatic impairment had no clinically relevant effect on esaxerenone exposure. Esaxerenone dosage adjustment based on PKs is unlikely to be needed in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-163339. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.

Absolute Bioavailability of Esaxerenone and Food Effects on its Pharmacokinetics After a Single Oral Dose in Healthy Japanese Subjects: An Open-Label Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the absolute bioavailability of esaxerenone and the effects of food on its pharmacokinetics (PK) after a single oral dose in healthy Japanese subjects. METHODS: Twenty-four Japanese males aged 20-45 years were randomised to six groups (each n = 4) in this single-centre, open-label, three-way, three-period crossover study. Esaxerenone (5 mg) was administered in the fasting state as a single oral dose, single intravenous infusion over 1 h, or in the postprandial state as a single oral dose. Plasma samples were taken before and during the 96 h after drug administration. Drug concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis, and safety was assessed. RESULTS: After fasting intravenous administration, total body clearance was 3.69 L h-1 and volume of distribution was 92.7 L. The plasma concentration-time profile of esaxerenone was similar after fasting and postprandial administration. Absolute bioavailability of a single oral 5-mg dose of esaxerenone was 89.0% in the fasting state and 90.8% postprandially. Point estimates (1.010 and 1.019, respectively) and 90% confidence intervals for geometric least squares mean peak plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios after postprandial versus fasting oral esaxerenone were within the prespecified range (0.80, 1.25). No severe adverse events occurred throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Esaxerenone has a high absolute bioavailability of approximately 90% and food has no effect on esaxerenone PK after a single oral dose of 5 mg in healthy Japanese subjects. Additionally, no safety concerns were identified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI No. 163452. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.